Letters, the selected letters of poet Elizabeth Bishop, is a major literary event. With her astounding ear and refined eye, details in her poetry speak volumes without necessarily revealing the events or even the major characters that inspired her writing.
In it she meditates on the art of losing, building up a small catalogue of losses which includes house keys and a mother's watch, before climaxing in the loss of houses, land and a loved one.
One art poem essay is a part-autobiographical poem and mirrors the actual losses Elizabeth Bishop experienced during her lifetime.
Her father, for instance, died when she was a baby, and her mother suffered a nervous breakdown some years later. The young poet had to live with her relatives and never saw her mother again.
In her mature years she lost her partner to suicide.
One Art carefully if casually records these events, beginning innocently enough with an ironic play on 'the art', before moving on to more serious losses. It culminates in the personal loss of a loved one, and the admission that, yes, this may look like a disaster. Lose something every day. Accept the fluster of lost door keys, the hour badly spent.
Then practice losing farther, losing faster: None of these will bring disaster. I lost two cities, lovely ones. And, vaster, some realms I owned, two rivers, a continent.
Analysis One Art is a villanelle, that is, it consists of five tercets rhyming aba and a quatrain of abaa. Traditionally the villanelle is in iambic pentameter, each line having five stresses or beats and an average of ten syllables. So the first line scans: The art of losing isn't hard to master; with notable unstressed endings to most lines.
The second line of each stanza solidifies the whole with full end rhyme. The opening line is repeated as the last line of the second and fourth tercets.
The third line of the initial tercet is repeated as the last line of the third and fifth tercets. The opening line and the third line together become the refrain which is repeated in the last two lines of the quatrain.
Elizabeth Bishop slightly modified the lines but minor changes are allowed within the basic villanelle. The idea is to create a sort of dance of words, repeating certain lines whilst building up variations on a theme, all within the tight knit form.
Note the use of enjambment, carrying on the sense of a line on into the next, which occurs in the first four stanzas, bringing a smooth if considered energy into the poem.
The fifth stanza is different. It has punctuation, a comma and two periods end stopscausing the reader to pause, as if the speaker is hesitant. The last stanza is fully enjambed, each line flowing into the next, despite the unexpected use of parentheses.
As you read through, note the almost conversational, tongue-in-cheek tone, with some irony to spice it up. It's as if the poet initially is reminding herself of just what it means to lose something; it's no big deal we're told, certainly not a disaster? First Stanza The speaker chooses to turn the idea of loss into an art form and tries to convince the reader and herself that certain things inherently want to be lost and that, when they do get lost, it's nothing to cry about because it was bound to happen in the first place.
This is a fateful approach, gracefully accepted by the speaker. Second Stanza Following on in logical fashion, if fate dictates and things want to get lost, then why not lose something on a daily basis?
Seems a tad wacky, an offbeat statement. Who wants to lose a thing and then not get emotional about it? Each and every day? The speaker is suggesting that things, keys, and even time equate to the same thing - they're capable of being lost, absent from your life for no other reason other than they are.
Some people are better at it than others. The absent minded perhaps? Those individuas who are in some way fated, who have a talent for losing things.This is why in this poem Bishop creates a new art by claiming that writing and losing are one art.
Because of this intent, losing the things is “no disaster”. But the repetitive structure of the villanelle gives the effect of the difficulty of losing important things. Essay on Loss In "One Art" by Elizabeth Bishop Words 3 Pages One Art by Elizabeth Bishop is a poem that explores loss in comparison to an art; however, this art is not one .
One Art Analysis Symbols, Imagery, Wordplay "One Art" approaches loss in a rather sidelong manner; it doesn’t dive straight in and attack the big issues, like the loss of a home or a loved one, but instead begins with the little things.
Every person loses sometimes. In Elizabeth Bishop’s poem “One Art,” Bishop displays her accepting attitude to losing. Using verse form and language, Bishop . Joanne Feit Diehl. Bishop's late poem, "One Art' (whose title conveys the implicit suggestion that mastery sought over loss in love is closely related to poetic control), articulates the tension between discipline in life and the force of circumstance.
In her poem, "One Art," Elizabeth Bishop constructs a poem that reveals a struggle with mastering the issue of loss. Through the use of a villanelle, Bishop utilizes the significance of structure and word choice to further the meaning of her work.